Seiten

Saturday, 30 March 2024

High Performance Polymers for Medical Technology Applications - Gradical Podcast Episode Nr. 21: Herwig Juster & Lucas R. Pianegonda

High Performance Polymers for Medical Technology Applications - Gradical Podcast Episode Nr. 21: Herwig Juster & Lucas R. Pianegonda

Hello and welcome to this new post. I was invited to the Gradical Podcast and I talked with the host Lucas about high performance polymers in medical technology field. Als, I gave a general overview on high performance polymers, what are the most important ones and in which industries, apart from medial, they are used. Episode is in German language.

Here the link to the Episode. 

Thanks and #findoutaboutplastics

Greetings,

Herwig Juster 

Interested in having a second opinion on your material selection and high performance polymers, including price evaluation or  discuss with me about your current sustainability, and part design needs - here you can contact me 

Interested in my monthly blog posts – then subscribe here and receive my high performance polymers knowledge matrix.

New to my Find Out About Plastics Blog – check out the start here section

Interested in our material solutions - check out our product page here





Monday, 18 March 2024

Guest Interview with Lucas R. Pianegonda, Managing Director and Lead Plastic Expert at Gradical: "Form a better world – with plastics"

Hello everyone and welcome to this guest interview. Today I present to you Lucas R. Pianegonda who is Managing Director and Lead Plastic Expert at Gradical GmbH, which supports you in the medical sector with plastics evaluation, material compliance or material testing.

In this guest interview, we have the chance to learn about medical grade plastics and their selection, what their mantra “Form a better world – with plastics” means, and how one can incorporate sustainability in the medical device environment. 

Enjoy the interview!


Tell us about yourself, your current role, and your company Gradical GmbH. 

I’m a medical grade plastic expert and I help medical technology companies to choose the right plastic for their applications. This regarding their technical, regulatory and sustainability requirements. I studied material science at ETH Zürich and then went to industry. Initially I worked at a plastic manufacturing company EMS Chemie where I was responsible for material testing and material data models. I then went on to work for a company that produces two component mixing and storage solutions – medmix. There I was responsible for plastic material selection, material compliance and sustainable materials. Armed with this experience I founded Gradical in 2022. Gradical is a consultancy for all things medical plastics and I am simultaneously lead plastic expert and managing director. 

A main mantra of yours is to “Form a better world – with plastics” - How do you achieve this and what are your main service and solution offerings?

The goal of medical technology companies is to improve the lives of people. But medical technology companies are facing huge challenges. The regulatory landscape, new sustainability requirements and skilled labor shortage to name a few. Plastics currently have a bad reputation which is undeserved in my opinion. I think plastic are contributing in bringing said medical solutions to market. Medical technology companies are in need of plastic know-how in order to get their product to market and our services enable this. We offer services and trainings regarding plastic evaluation, material compliance and material testing. Our two standard trainings “Sustainable plastics in medical technology” and “regulatory aspects of plastic selection” are very popular. This shows that people are interested in these topics and want to learn more. 

How do you define the term “Medical Grade Plastic” and what are the most used Medical Grade Plastics in which applications?

“Medical Grade Plastics” is no protected expression. So a lot of plastics manufacturers call their materials “medical grade” as soon as they have tested some aspects of biocompatibility and there is an application in the medical field. However in 2017 the VDI has put together a guideline on what a medical grade plastic is. The main aspects of the definition are change management, regulatory support and supply security. I think it meets the requirements of medical technology companies and therefore this is the definition I always use.

As for main plastics and their applications: The most used plastics in medical technology, as in all applications, are commodities such as PP, PE and PVC. PE is used for packaging, caps and closures. PP is used for syringes and other disposables. PVC is used for tubing, blood bags, blisters or also for hospital flooring. Engineering plastics and high performance plastics are used where the commodities do not meet the requirements. Examples include clamps from PA6, Lenses from PMMA, surgical devices made from PPSU or implants made from PEEK. The class of thermoplastic elastomers also should not be underestimated too. They are used in applications where softness and elasticity is needed which includes tubing, handles and sealings. 

Industries are gradually switching to more sustainable material offering for their products. How is this trend affecting the material selection in the medical device industry in terms of using sustainable plastics alternatives such as recycled, bio-based or biodegradable plastics?

This is one of our expertise. Medical device companies start to look into sustainability more and more. They are still hesitant to using sustainable materials due to the major hurdles to bringing a device to market. If they bring something to market it needs to be a success and therefore they don’t want to make the wrong decision. There are however pioneers that are already using biobased plastics or even recycling plastics in their medical device. Biodegradable plastics seldomly bring advantages over biobased conventional plastics, therefore I think they will stay in niche applications. Recycling plastic have the issue of needing much more quality control and risk management measures, a topic that is already unclear for conventional plastics, this leads to the conservative approach of not using recycled plastics in medical device. I often hear that recycled plastics cannot be used due to “regulatory requirements” this is simply not true. A medical device company has to show that the recycled plastic yields to a safe and effective medical device. Most companies do not know how to show this, not that it is an easy task, and therefore decide against using recycled plastics. The most promising approach to sustainable plastics in the medical field however is the so called, mass balance approach, were the same plastics can be used as drop in solutions for existing grades. This with a vastly improved footprint. Since we believe in this approach we started offering project support and coaching for companies willing to obtain mass balance certifications such as ISCC+.

How do you see “Design for Recycling” in the field of Medical Grade Plastics? In addition, are there already some circular economy examples where medical grade plastics find a second life? 

Medical applications cause a significant portion of the plastic waste. I’ve seen studies that estimate it at 3-5 % of the total plastic waste. Another study showed that 80% of plastic waste in hospitals is neither contaminated nor infectious and therefore could be recycled. I think recycling of medical waste has a future. This also means that medical technology companies should think about how to design medical devices, pharmaceutical packaging and in-vitro diagnostics such that they can be recycled. As for examples, Novo Nordisk has launched a take back program for their self-injection pens which they then recycle. Currently there are still down cycling the materials into chairs, but it would not surprise me if it will be possible in the future to manufacture new pens from the recycled material. We have to be cautious tough, plastics are not infinitely recyclable. At some points properties degrade and we need to complement this with other solutions such as biobased or chemically recycled virgin-like plastics.

Where can the readers find out more about you and your offers for the medical device industry?
I mean the best source would definitely be to contact my for a quick exchange. I love meeting new people and whoever is interested in our services, I’m very happy to present them to you. The other obvious source is our website: www.gradical.ch which has gotten an upgrade recently. For the more auditive predisposed: we do also have a podcast Gradical Podcast - Der Podcast zu Kunststoffen in der Medizintechnik | Podcast on Spotify where I interview experts on different topics related to plastics in medical device. The reader might be interested in hearing your interview about high performance plastics. 

That was the guest interview with Lucas R. Pianegonda from Gradical – many thanks Lucas for our exchange on topics such as Medical Grade Plastics and their selection, and your motivation to “Form a better world – with plastics” .

Thanks for reading!

Greetings and #findoutaboutplastics
Herwig Juster

Monday, 11 March 2024

Design Data for PolyArylAmide (PARA; PA MXD6) Selection: Mechanical Properties as Function of Temperature and Humidity

Hello and welcome to this post in which I present additional multipoint data of reinforced PolyArylAmides (PA MXD6; PARA) as support during your material selection journey. 

Basic data of PARA I discussed in the following posts: 

Design Properties for Engineers: The ABCs of Polyarylamide (PARA; MXD6)

Polyarylamide vs Polyamide (PARA vs PA): What are the Major Differences Between PARA and PA (Polymer Material Selection Tip)?

In this post, we focus on: 

  • Tensile strength properties as a function of temperature
  • Flexural strength properties as a function of temperature
  • Impact properties as a function of temperature
  • Tensile strength and modulus at equilibrium as a function of relative humidity

Tensile strength properties as a function of temperature

Figure 1 presents the tensile strength and tensile modulus as a function of temperature of a PARA with 50 wt% glass-fiber reinforcement (DAM = Dry as moulded). We can see a decrease in strength with increasing temperature and once we reached the glass transition temperature (85°C), this decrease becomes sharper (semi-crystalline region is still providing strength). 

Figure 1: Tensile strength properties of PARA GF 50 wt% as a function of temperature [1].

Flexural strength properties as a function of temperature

Figure 2 shows the flexural strength and flexural modulus as a function of temperature of a PARA with 50 wt% glass-fiber reinforcement. Flexural strength values are higher compared to tensile strength values since this test combines compressive, tensile, and shear stresses (ISO 178 or ASTM D790) leading to a greater plasticizing effect than in a pure tensile test. 

Figure 2: Flexural strength properties of PARA GF 50 wt% as a function of temperature [1].

Impact properties as a function of temperature

Figure 3 shows the Izod impact strength (notched and unnotched) of a 50 wt% glass fiber reinforced PARA compound. The figure illustrates how temperature affects the PARA compound's ability to withstand impacts. We can see that this characteristic essentially stays unchanged below the glass transition threshold of 85°C. The viscous condition of the amorphous portions causes an increase in impact resistance above this temperature.

Figure 3: Impact properties of PARA GF 50 wt% as a function of temperature [1].

Tensile strength and modulus at equilibrium as a function of relative humidity

Figure 4 presents the tensile strength at equilibrium and Figure 5 the tensile modulus at equilibrium of a PARA-GF 50 wt%, PARA-GF 60 wt%, and PARA-GF 50 wt% with impact modification. All aforementioned PARA compounds use a PA MXD6 resin which contains amide functions. In case the amide function is exposed to water, a reversible plasticizer complex is formed (as with all Polyamides). The water absorption leads to three major consequences which need to be considered during the design phase:

-The plasticzing leads to a reduction in mechanical properties (as shown in Figure 4 and 5).

-Swelling of the material and as a consequence, dimensional changes of the part

-Reduction in the glass transition temperature. PARA-GF 50 wt% which is saturated with water reduces its glass transition from 85°C down to 25 °C. This is influencing the creep resistance of the material and in case the part was injection moulded below 120°C, post-crystallization takes place. This leads to a deformation of the part.  

Therefore, testing the PARA compound at actual use conditions, especially if permanent water contact is present, is crucial in order to avoid problems related to water uptake. 

Figure 4: Tensile strength at equilibrium of PARA compounds as a function of relative humidity. [1]

Figure 5: Tensile modulus at equilibrium of PARA compounds as a function of relative humidity [1].
Conclusions

The advantage of having multipoint mechanical properties of PARA compounds plotted in a graph is that it enables a better decision making during the part design and material selection phase. 

More on high performance polymers can be found here and here.

Thanks for reading and #findoutaboutplastics

Greetings,

Herwig Juster 

Interested in having a second opinion on your material selection and high performance polymers, including price evaluation or  discuss with me about your current sustainability, and part design needs - here you can contact me 

Interested in my monthly blog posts – then subscribe here and receive my high performance polymers knowledge matrix.

New to my Find Out About Plastics Blog – check out the start here section

Interested in our material solutions - check out our product page here



Literature: 

[1] https://www.syensqo.com/en/brands/ixef-para/documents

[2] https://www.albis.com/dam/jcr:3e0fc093-ea63-466f-9a67-43f796bc08ea/Ixef-PARA-Design-Guide_EN.pdf


Monday, 4 March 2024

High Heat Plastics Selection: Liquid Crystal Polymers (LCP) - Decreasing Wall Thickness, Increasing Tensile Strength?

Hello and welcome to this blog post in which we discuss the high heat polymer Liquid Crystal Polymer (LCP) and its specific properties. In general, defining the part requirements can be seen as a common starting point in polymer material selection. However when selecting high heat plastics, short and long time temperature performance plays a key role too. Also, implementing design features such as thin wall part design is another drive of the usage of high performance polymers. However, what happens if the wall thickness of LCP parts is decreased. Will the tensile strength keeps constant or is there a different behaviour to be observed?

Introduction to Liquid Crystal Polymers

Based on their superiority in high heat solder resistance, high-temperature strength, dimensional stability, overall good chemical resistance, low flammability, and low water absorption, liquid crystalline polymers (LCPs) are widely employed in many types of electric and electronic parts (connectors). Since LCPs have an exceptionally low melt viscosity, they have better thin-wall fluidity and mouldability compared to any other engineering plastics. LCPs are currently utilized for the most highly precise applications, also where Surface Mounting Technology (SMT) is needed. Electric and electronic devices moulded using LCPs have grown in significance in recent years for the IT-related industries as well as many consumer markets. Recent developments of high heat LCPs include the usage as high-heat EV battery module insulation [2].

Not to be overlooked is the fact that every LCP has a unique chemical structure. This implies that although the term "liquid crystalline polymer" refers to the overall set of features, each manufacturer of LCP may have unique chemical structures and this is similar to polyamides. For example, PA6 and PA 4.6 show significantly differing thermal resistance, yet they both absorb more water than polyesters and have poorer dimension stability. While each polyamide has a unique chemical structure that determines its different thermal resistance, the amide-bonding group determines the increased water absorption property.

Looking into the literature [1] of polymer chemistry, we can distinguish between

-Type I LCP (HDT a 1.82 MPa > 260°C), 

-Type II LCP (HDT = 210-260°C), and

-Type III (HDT < 210°C). 

All three types contain a p-hydroxybenzoic group and are called  “thermotropic” LCP ( in contract to “lyotropic” LCP = liquid crystals can be seen in solvent as a solution). The crystals stay solid in the melt phase and can be modelled as matchsticks during the injection moulding filling process. Applying shear to the polymer will result in a very good alignment of the matchsticks.

Summarizing the key pros and cons of LCP:

Pros:

-High thermal resistance (up to 260 °C)

-Barrier properties (due to dense skin layer)

-Excellent soldering resistance for lead-free reflow soldering processes

-Solvent stability (except alkali & steam)

-Superior high flowability

-High flame retardancy (UL 94 V-0 @0.3 mm)

Cons:

-Strong anisotropy in moulded parts

-Lower weld line strength

Thermal properties: CUT vs. HDT of LCP 

The short term temperature resistance of engineering polymers can be improved by adding glass-fiber reinforcement, however the long term temperature resistance stays on a similar level. This is different with high heat plastics such as PEEK, PPS, LCP, Polyarylates (PAR), Polysulfones (PSU, PESU, PPSU), and Polyimides (PEI, PAI, PI). They combine a high short- and long term thermal resistance. Figure 1 compares the Continuous Use temperature (CUT) to the Heat Deflection Temperature (HDT; short term temperature resistance) of high performance and engineering polymers.  LCP has an excellent short- and long-term temperature stability.

Figure 1: Short-term (HDT 1.8 MPa) vs. long-term temperature resistance (CUT) of engineering and high performance polymers such as LCP, PEEK, and PPS.

What is the glass transition and melt temperature of LCP?

LCPs do not have a “glass transition” temperature in the classical way of definition (Alpha temperature transition enabling the movement of more than 40 C-atoms in backbone [3]). They have a liquid crystal temperature. Figure 2 shows the DMA curves of PESU (amorphous; Tg = 220°C), PEEK (semi-crystalline; Tg=143°C; Tm =334°C), and LCP (Tlc = 300-380°C). LCP does not have a glass transition temperature, nor a melting temperature. It has a liquid crystalline temperature where the crystals  remain solid, however the linkages between the solid crystals can move [1]. If you examine in detail the literature, a small transition temperature of LCP was found at 120°C. LCP can keep a high mechanical strength level up to 300 °C, outperforming PEEK and PESU. 

Figure 2: DMA of high performance polymers - LCP has a liquid crystalline transition area. 

Wall thickness and tensile strength

Moving back to the question from the beginning of this post: what is the relationship between wall thickness and tensile strength of LCP? 

The skin layer's thickness of LCP is almost 200 μm and is a result of the strong orientation of the solid crystal elements (“matchsticks”). The ratio of the skin layer to the total thickness increases proportionately as the thickness decreases. The skin layer has strong mechanical properties since it is made up of highly aligned fibrous semi-crystals of stiff rod molecules. Because of this, LCP's strength will progressively rise as its thickness decreases. Figure 3 shows this relationship of a LCP, and comparing it to a PBT and PESU. This is a common and unique feature of LCP that isn't seen in traditional polymers. 

Figure 3: Tensile strength as a function of wall thickness of LCP, PESU, and PBT. 

Conclusions

Designing parts with high performance polymers such as LCP is not more difficult compared to engineering or commodity polymers. It is different and the dependency of mechanical properties as a function of wall thickness allows applications made out of LCP to be really thin and still fulfill stringent requirements such as temperature, flame retardancy, and strength.

More on high performance polymers can be found here and here.

Thanks for reading and #findoutaboutplastics

Greetings,

Herwig Juster 

Interested in having a second opinion on your material selection and high performance polymers or  discuss with me about your current sustainability, and part design needs - here you can contact me 

Interested in my monthly blog posts – then subscribe here and receive my high performance polymers knowledge matrix.

New to my Find Out About Plastics Blog – check out the start here section

Interested in our material solutions - check out our product page here



Literature: 

[1] https://www.sumitomo-chem.co.jp/sep/english/products/pdf/lcp_users_manual_v31_e.pdf

[2] https://www.solvay.com/en/press-release/solvay-introduces-new-polymer-high-heat-ev-battery-module-insulation

[3] https://www.findoutaboutplastics.com/2018/12/dynamic-mechanical-analysis-dma-as.html

[4] https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=13872

[5] https://www.ptonline.com/articles/tracing-the-history-of-polymeric-materials-part-27-lcp